![]() ![]() Needs assessment will form the basis for the development of methodology, which will detail the decision-making supporting mechanisms, and civil protection system procedures at the local level. Standard operating procedures in crisis situations will be established within the project, which will increase preparedness and enable all participants in the project to connect through a common IT platform.ĬOMMAND d will allow capacity analysis at the local level in Croatia, North Macedonia, and Montenegro (UCPM countries), as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Albania (IPA II countries). The results of the project will facilitate and accelerate data reception, GIS analysis/ simulation of developments, and emergency data transfer. The city of Skopje (The Republic of North Macedonia)ĬOMMAND d is a project devised to help support operations command centre be prepared for disasters at a local level. The city of Tuzla (The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina) The Municipality of Tirana (The Republic of Albania) Zagrebacka County (The Republic of Croatia) I never use the -d flag when I pass no arguments at all.Commanding and Operations Mechanism for Multisector Analysis of Nexus Disaster data. ![]() I rarely use the -d flag it when I pass a single directory.I almost always use the -d flag when I pass wildcards to ls.The result of ls -ld */* can only be obtained with the -d flag. The alternative ls -l */ does too, but in a different way, and usually I prefer the more compact output of ls -ld */* and of course, the wildcards allow me to match only some names, whereas ls -l */ always lists all contents of the subdirectories. The ls -l */* alternative does not give me much information about the directories one/a, one/b, two/c, or two/d, whereas ls -ld */* does. ![]() When I'm using wildcards, usually I do not want to descend into directories. With ls -ld dirname you get some useful information such as permissions, ownership, and timestamp, but you can also get that with stat dirname. With only one argument, I don't find it very useful either. Ls -d without additional arguments is rarely useful. In this answer, I'd like to expand on why or when this is useful. Jeff Schaller ♦s answer explains how/why the -d flag behaves this way. I mean, it doesn't even show the default. It doesn't matter what other flags are in place, if the D flag is in then two separate implementations of ls only show the current directory. # The full text flag also doesn't ls -directory directory on the -d flag, even when combined with other flags. Here we can see that they take flags just fine, and they find the two directories perfectly fine, but TWO implementations of ls only return the. Both these commands take appropriate flags. Lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Mar 13 18:55 mdcmd -> /usr/local/sbin/mdcmdĭrwxrwxrwx 2 root root 140 Mar 24 10:10 pkg/Īgain these icons are missing here, but the single directory in here "lsd" has the correct folder icon. de-workspaceĭrwxrwxrwx 3 root root 140 Mar 18 11:35 lsd/ ![]() Lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Mar 14 16:41 de-workspace ->. □ lsd/ □ pkg/ □ □ ls lsd/ lsd -FĪde-workspace lsd mdcmd ls -lhp The correct response is that there are 2 folders in ~, lsd and pkg lsd Let's use my home directory as an example. I prefixed the prompt lines with > just to make them easier to pick out. LSD has been installed for a few days and isn't the issue. I replaced all the boxes with browser compatible emojis just for clarity. The missing codepoint is just a folder □ icon. If I type ls in the /etc directory, where there are obviously several subfolders (which you can see without the -d flag), I get the following: ls -d ls lsd -d I mention this because the error may have something to do with the alias.įor testing right now, I have alias ls=ls in place to remove any of my custom commands. I have standard ls installed, I also have lsd installed, which is a nerd-font drop-in replacement for ls. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |